8/7/2023 0 Comments Daily mirror harry and meghan![]() ![]() ![]() In some cases, the very litigious person may be “deflecting away from other difficulties,” Dr Jacobson suggests. When we do it often, we have to wonder whether that (perhaps overdeveloped) sense of justice is the driving force rather than the actuality of the event.” “So you believe a wrong has been done and you’re willing to put the time, effort and resources into redressing that imbalance. Those who become fixated on litigation are generally motivated by a desire, whether misplaced or justified, to restore justice. “Generally, addiction is when a habit tips over to the point of affecting one’s life and wellbeing,” says Dr Sheri Jacobson, founder of .uk and a retired psychotherapist. It also seems conceivable that the sense of purpose that drives him may have given way to obsession, if not full-blown addiction. He has, after all, described his efforts to change the media landscape as his “life’s work”. Is it possible, then, that he has become addicted to litigation itself? It is certainly possible to argue – as some have – that he views himself as the leader of a moral crusade against what he views as the egregious conduct of the British media. He is also pursuing legal action against the Government over his security arrangements. He is one of seven people bringing legal action against Associated Newspapers over allegations it carried out or commissioned unlawful information gathering (which the publisher has denied). In May 2019, the Duke accepted substantial damages from Splash News and Picture Agency for taking photographs of his Cotswolds home from a helicopter. The above is not an exhaustive list, merely a selection. In 2021, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex issued a legal letter to some news outlets, via Schillings law firm, accusing the BBC of “false and defamatory” reporting in an article that claimed the couple had not asked the late Queen about naming their daughter Lilibet. The publisher reportedly paid “substantial damages” to the Duke. The following year, he sued Associated Newspapers for libel over two articles claiming he had “turned his back” on the Royal Marines after stepping away from frontline royal duties. You’d be forgiven for losing track of his various lawsuits, which have been troubling the courts since 2019, when he launched legal action against the owners of The Sun, the defunct News of the World and the Daily Mirror over alleged phone-hacking dating back to between 19. After voting for Megxit with his feet, publishing an explosive, accusatory, score-settling memoir, and starring in all six hours of an explosive, accusatory and score-settling Netflix documentary, Prince Harry apparently still has scores to settle. ![]() ![]() He has, for several years, been doggedly turning litigation into something of a vocation. To put it mildly, this is not the Duke’s first rodeo. MGN has told the High Court in London it denies that 28 of them involved unlawful information gathering, and that it was not admitted for the remaining five articles. He alleges that 147 articles published between 19 by Mirror titles contained information gathered using unlawful methods, with 33 of these stories selected to be considered at the trial. Does this remind you, perhaps, of any California-based member of the British Royal family? This week, the Duke of Sussex is back in court again – this time in person – as he brings his legal case against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |